The direct cost of a Rent Repayment Order is the money. The indirect cost is often larger, because insurance policies and buy-to-let mortgages both tend to assume a landlord is complying with licensing law — and both ask questions when they discover otherwise.
A note on what this article can and cannot tell you. Insurers and lenders set their own terms, and they differ widely. Nothing here is a statement of what any particular provider will do. It is a guide to the questions worth asking and the clauses worth reading.
Insurance
The duty of fair presentation
Business insurance, which is what most landlord policies are, is governed by the Insurance Act 2015. It imposes a duty of fair presentation of the risk: you must disclose every material circumstance you know or ought to know, or at least give the insurer enough to prompt further enquiry.
Prosecutions, civil penalties, enforcement notices and a property being unlicensed are all capable of being material. If a fair presentation is not made, the remedy depends on what would have happened had it been: the insurer may be able to avoid the policy, reduce a claim proportionately, or apply the terms it would otherwise have imposed.
Read the compliance condition
Many landlord policies contain a condition requiring compliance with statutory obligations — licensing, gas safety, electrical safety, fire precautions. A breach can give the insurer grounds to decline a claim that has nothing obvious to do with licensing, because the condition sits across the whole policy.
Practical points
- Disclose enforcement action at renewal rather than waiting to be asked.
- Check whether the policy asks about convictions or penalties — and whether it asks about the company’s directors as well as the company.
- A Rent Repayment Order is not generally an insured loss. It is a repayment of rent you received, not third-party liability, and landlord policies do not usually cover it.
- Legal expenses cover attached to a landlord policy may fund defending a claim — check the terms and any exclusion for regulatory breaches.
Buy-to-let mortgages
The conditions that matter
Buy-to-let terms commonly require the borrower to:
- comply with all statutes and regulations affecting the property, licensing included;
- obtain consent before letting on an HMO basis, or before multiple-occupancy letting at all;
- notify the lender of material changes, and in some cases of proceedings or convictions.
Letting a property as an unlicensed HMO can breach more than one of these at once — especially where the mortgage was taken out on the basis of a single-family letting.
What a lender might do
Consequences vary by lender and by the seriousness of the breach, but the possibilities that appear in standard terms include requiring the breach to be remedied, imposing conditions, declining to renew at the end of a product term, restricting further lending, and in serious cases treating the loan as repayable.
The more common practical outcome is quieter: difficulty remortgaging at the point the fixed rate ends, and a narrower set of lenders willing to look at the case.
Portfolio effects
Portfolio landlords are usually underwritten across the whole portfolio. A problem at one property can therefore affect refinancing at others, which is why an enforcement action at a single address can have consequences out of proportion to its size.
The compliance record
The Renters’ Rights Act 2025 creates a national Private Rented Sector Database, expected during the second phase of implementation in late 2026. It records civil penalties, banning orders and relevant offences, and is designed to be visible to tenants as well as to councils.
Once enforcement history is straightforwardly discoverable, it becomes harder to treat as a private matter between a landlord and a council — and easier for an underwriter to find.
If you are a landlord facing a claim
- Read the policy and the mortgage conditions before you respond to anything, so you know what your disclosure obligations actually are.
- Take advice on disclosure timing. Late disclosure is generally worse than early disclosure.
- Regularise the licensing position now. It does not undo a past offence, but it stops the offence continuing — and it is relevant to how the tribunal assesses conduct.
- Engage properly with the tribunal. Conduct is a statutory factor under section 44(4), and a landlord who co-operates and puts evidence in on time tends to fare better than one who does not.
- Do not assume insurance will cover the order. It usually will not.
If you are a tenant
This is the context you are operating in, and it explains a good deal of landlord behaviour. The order itself may be the smallest part of the problem for them, which is why some settle early and some fight hard. Neither reaction tells you much about the strength of your claim — that is decided by the licensing register and your bank statements.
Start with the facts. Send us the address and the dates you lived there and we will check whether a licence was required and whether there was one — free, and with no obligation. Check your claim →
This article is general information about the law in England and is not legal, insurance or financial advice. Insurance and mortgage terms vary between providers — always read your own policy and conditions, and take advice specific to your circumstances. The rules differ in Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland.
Think this applies to you? Checking whether your landlord needed a licence is free and takes about two minutes. Check NOW to see if your landlord needs a licence.